Setting standards for immigration

In case you missed it, Deal did a brief interview Friday with the Dallas Morning News on the subject of Catholic teaching and immigration. It’s a short piece, but informative, and included this interesting exchange:

[D]oes a government have a moral right to set limits on the kinds of people who enter?

Kinds of people? Practically speaking, these disputes are always about some group or groups of people.

Just because this case is about Mexicans does not prove, in itself, that discrimination is involved. It only means that the border with Mexico is where the problem is originating. If it were Canadians, the debate would be the same.

I do think this mess is more of our making than Mexico’s. For some reason, in 2005 everyone decided to get all crazy about it, when they should have seen it coming for 20 years.

By “kinds of people,” I mean that some folks want more highly educated workers let into the U.S.

I don’t think entry into the U.S. should be based upon IQ or, especially, university degrees — they would all become Democrats! (Oh, well, maybe not IQ.)

I don’t think we want to make our decisions based on whether a particular group is contributing to the economy. That makes it even more problematic morally. Then you would have debates over who is providing benefits and who is not. You get into questions of what constitutes a benefit. Is it the level of a salary? Amount of taxes paid? Kind of work done? That becomes impossibly subjective.

I have a feeling some may disagree on this point. Do you think there’s anything wrong with setting criteria for who may or may not immigrate (and in what numbers)? From my understanding, Canada does that very thing, favoring those in the fields of technology or healthcare. Could that work in the United States, or would it run contrary to our Come-All-Ye-Huddled-Masses character?

Here’s the complete interview. As I mentioned, it’s short but good.

Brian Saint-Paul

By

Brian Saint-Paul was the editor and publisher of Crisis Magazine. He has a BA in Philosophy and an MA in Religious Studies from the Catholic University of America, in Washington. D.C. In addition to various positions in journalism and publishing, he has served as the associate director of a health research institute, a missionary, and a private school teacher. He lives with his wife in a historic Baltimore neighborhood, where he obsesses over Late Antiquity.

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)
MENU