‘Man of the Word’

At an MRI recently, the receptionist told me that it would last two hours. It seemed a bit long. Two young African-American technicians ran the eerie instrument, chatting while settling me in. They put a set of headphones on me and kindly tuned to a rap radio station. After about two minutes, I asked them to shut it off; it was driving me batty. Still alive at the end, they unharnessed me, garbed in hospital gown.
Back in the dressing room, I put on my clericals and walked out. Going by the technicians’ office, I said goodbye. One of them looked at me astonished. “I didn’t know that you were a man of the Word.” I had to laugh: My clerical status does not shine through a hospital gown. I do not ever remember being called a “man of the Word.” No doubt, this form of address is an honored title in black Protestant churches. It was meant as that.

The title made me think. Is a priest a “man of the Word?” His three powers are to “teach, to rule, and to sanctify.” So, yes, he is a man of the Word. He recognizes Scripture — and, through it, the Church and Christ — as the source of any “word” he speaks in its name. The man of the Word is first to be sure that his word is the word that the Lord handed down, not his own musings about pious things.
Yet a priest, more properly, is a “man of the Word made flesh,” but that is a little awkward. He is ordained in the name of the Word made flesh, not in his own name. The “man of the Word” is a preacher. He speaks authoritatively from the pulpit. He moves souls. Generally, the phrase implies Word over Sacrament, or Word without Sacrament. In those senses, it is not precisely Catholic; that is, Word and Sacrament, or Word within Sacrament.
St. John says, “In the beginning was the Word.” This Word was “with God.” Indeed, He “was God.” The Word is the Logos. The Word is the Son, who is begotten, not made, of the Father, true God. In the sixth weekday Preface in the Mass, addressing ourselves to the Father, we say that it is our duty to give the Father thanks. This duty is first a response of wonder at what the Father is. It is given to us by the Father, to whom all things begin and return.
We can only give thanks through Christ. He is the Way and the Truth. And who is this Christ? “He is the Word through whom you [Father] created the universe, the Savior you sent to redeem us.” These are statements of fact, of intelligibility. When He is sent, the Word — the Son — remains God but becomes and remains also “true man.”
Christ, then, is not a “Man of the Word.” He is the Word. Thus, Christ tells Philip, “He who has seen me has seen the Father.” He does not become the Father; He is one with the Father. He is really present in the Eucharist. The priest there does not speak in his own name, but in the person of Christ. The priest is not a “man of the Word,” but a man who speaks the Word commanded and communicated to him.
Msgr. Robert Sokolowski, in a remarkable essay on the Eucharist (Communio, Winter 1997) sketched out how easy it is to undermine the whole idea of the Trinity, the revealed understanding of the inner life of God, by doubting the real presence of Christ the Word in the Eucharist:
Does not the denial of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist bring in its train a dilution of our Trinitarian faith? Does it not make us drift toward a unitarian understanding of divinity? If we question whether the Son is truly present in the Eucharist, are we not led to question whether he was truly present in the Incarnation, and then whether he is truly distinguished from the Father?
The Man of the Word is also a Man of the Eucharist. “Unless you eat this bread and drink of this cup, you shall not have everlasting life in you.”
After hearing of eating “My flesh” and drinking “My blood,” that no one comes to Him unless “granted by the Father,” many disciples left Him (Jn 6). The Lord turned to the apostles: “Will you too go away?” Peter responds, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.” This is what a man of the Word acknowledges and hopes. His words are nothing if not rooted in the Word made flesh, the eternal Son of the Father, present among us in the Eucharist.


Fr. James V. Schall


The Rev. James V. Schall, SJ, (1928-2019) taught government at the University of San Francisco and Georgetown University until his retirement in 2012. Besides being a regular Crisis columnist since 1983, Fr. Schall wrote nearly 50 books and countless articles for magazines and newspapers.

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)