A Man of Words and Deeds

 

Paul Johnson’s biography of Winston Churchill
is itself an event (Viking, 2009). Johnson unabashedly admires the British statesman, and his book tells why. It begins: “Of all the towering figures of the twentieth century, both good and evil, Winston Churchill was the most valuable to humanity, and also the most likable. It is a joy to write his life, and to read about it. None holds more lessons, especially for youth . . . .” Churchill lived through both the Great War of 1914 and its aftermath, World War II, and beyond, dying at 90 on January 30, 1965. (No doubt, the year 1965 seems to many today to be ancient history.)
 
Johnson points out that World War I may be much the greater tragedy. The neglect of studying the Great War is, I often think, the cause of much political blindness. Johnson writes, with overtones that go back to Thucydides: “Indeed the first of the two world wars proved the worst disaster in modern history, perhaps in all history, from which most of the subsequent problems of the twentieth century spring, and many of which continue, fortissimo, into the twenty first.”
 



Churchill was, in Aristotelian terms, a statesman, a man of action with the prudence that goes with it. He held most of the major cabinet posts in the British system at one time or another. He fought in World War I. He visited the Empire and talked to all, great and small. He wrote some
12 million words, mostly of history — elegant words. He learned to be a brick layer, to paint, and to run a stable of horses. He gained and lost several fortunes in the stock market.
 
But the chief activity of the postwar [World War II] Churchill was writing. This is the main reason Clementine [Churchill’s wife] was right to say the 1945 [electoral] defeat was a blessing in disguise. He had always believed — he said so explicitly in May 1938 — “Words are the only things that last for ever.” Between 1941 and 1945, he had performed great deeds. Now he needed to write the words to ensure that the deeds were correctly described and so made immortal.
 
The world of deeds is not complete without the world of words. Worlds of words without great deeds are empty. We are beings who act and speak both.
 
Johnson is insistent to point out that Churchill was a happy man in his marriage. His children he loved; he was a faithful husband. This faithfulness freed him for the great things that he knew he had to face. Had his personal life been disordered, he would not have been able to concentrate on the things that mattered, including having a good marriage itself.
 
In passages that will not make the anti-bomb people happy, Johnson points out that Churchill had no opposition to the massive bombing of German cities. Britain was ahead in developing the atom bomb but sent it over to the Americans to carry out. Johnson has no doubt that Churchill would have used the bomb if he had had it at his disposal, just as Harry Truman did. And for the same reason: namely, that he understood the consequences of not using it would have caused more havoc and death. The plans for the invasion of Japan, had it not surrendered, envisioned the killing of millions of soldiers and civilians, as well as the destruction of the physical plant of the country. Johnson is quite straightforward here in picturing Churchill’s pragmatic, no-illusions mind on war.
 
Churchill was a man who foresaw issues beyond the immediate problem at hand. He tried unsuccessfully to invade Russia from the north after Lenin took over. He understood the danger to humanity that Vladimir Lenin represented, something that Franklin Roosevelt evidently did not. Churchill was a man who got things done, whether it was in building the navy or providing munitions or counteracting political moves that frustrated what needed to be done. When his policy was defeated, he did what was second best — but he always did something.
 
Johnson pictures Churchill as a basically happy man. He was a man who enjoyed things from cigars and champagne, to jokes even about himself, to the camaraderie of the House of Commons. Churchill knew of the slaughter of war and of the dark side of human nature. He was not a particularly religious man, but he was a good man. He liked to sing off-key, “‘Ta-ra-ra-Boom-de-ay,’ ‘Daisy, Daisy,’ and old Boer War songs. His favorite was ‘Take a Pair of Sparkling Eyes’ from Gilbert and Sullivan’s The Gondoliers.”
 
These are Johnson’s last words, themselves reminiscent of Abraham Lincoln: “Everyone who values freedom under law, and government by, for, and from the people, can find comfort and reassurance in his life story.”

Fr. James V. Schall

By

The Rev. James V. Schall, SJ, (1928-2019) taught government at the University of San Francisco and Georgetown University until his retirement in 2012. Besides being a regular Crisis columnist since 1983, Fr. Schall wrote nearly 50 books and countless articles for magazines and newspapers.

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)
MENU