Sense and Nonsense: Willingly Being Deceived

Voiced by Amazon Polly

Truth has become unfriendly. We “hold” these truths that no truth can exist, that all views are created equal, that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are defined only by ourselves. They have no objective content. We have nothing in common except that we have nothing in common. Our civic peace exists on the supposition that no truth exists. Therefore, we are all “equal” in our common acceptance that no truth binds us. The order of our polity is the projection, outside of ourselves, of our souls.

To maintain that truth is important, even that such a thing exists, causes a dark suspicion of fanaticism. To be sure, we may merely mean, culturally, that any bold affirmation is “one’s own private truth.” It cannot mean that anyone’s “truth” has anything to do with anyone else’s “truth.” Certainly controversies about the truth of things cannot be resolved by human minds. We must always bracket “truth?’ Who, after all, dare say what it is? No source of authority exists outside of ourselves. Even when two people accidentally agree that some proposition is true, this agreement is not and cannot be the logical conclusion of a tight argument to which minds assent because they see the evidence. No evidence can coerce the mind to conclude this way or that. Hence, no one needs to see the truth of “truth” if he does not want to. To coin a phrase, everyone is “free to choose” his “truth.”

Scripture had it quite wrong, of course. It is not “truth” that shall make us free, but precisely its lack, its denial, its impossibility that will free us. For nature, it is said, reveals no order, no basis upon which we might base any affirmation that this or that is true or false. Our own souls, moreover, reveal no internal order to which we are attuned. The suspicion that there is a natural law or natural order, indeed, is a most dangerous one. “Truth” is not following reason. It is a private projection presupposed to nothing but an order-less reality filled with order-less souls.

In the third book of the Republic, Socrates remarks to Glaucon, “And isn’t being deceived about the truth a bad thing, while possessing the truth is good? Or don’t you think that to believe the things that are is to possess truth?” (413a) What’s this? Surely Socrates had it all wrong. To be “deceived about the truth” should mean, in today’s relativist terms, holding that truth is possible to know or achieve. The fundamental modern “truth?’ however, is that there is no truth. The things that are have no relation to any mind. To possess the “truth” is to see that our minds are the only source of intelligibility in the universe. Nothing out there is “speaking” to us.

 

In the classic view, by contrast, a world exists with its own order, an order it did not give itself but according to which it manifests itself to minds. Its truth is the relation of this order to the mind, as Anaxagoras said, to a mind that knew it first. In the universe, other minds are found. We ourselves possess them. They are open to this world and its order. With these minds, we can and want to know what is. We, on self-reflection, find minds with a kind of infinite thirst to know what is, to know what is not merely themselves.

In a world of no theoretic possibility of “truth?’ there can be no conversation, no grounds other than power to resolve differences or to affirm agreements. All our statements are mere declarations of what we “hold.” Some like to think that we must agree on limiting our “truths” to what does not “harm” others. But why we should accept such a limit is not so evident in lieu of some principle about why we should not harm, or even less what we mean by harm and to whom.

Truth, as I say, is unfriendly. Indeed, it is arrogant. It judges. It says of what is that it is, and of what is not, that it is not.

Certain principles, when embraced, destroy the mind. One of these is the claim that the mind can know nothing outside itself. A second concludes that what the mind knows cannot be communicated to another mind. A third insists that contradictory positions, which can be recognized even on the theoretical denial of truth, cannot resolve anything.

We must lower our sights. We do not coexist with one another on the basis of agreement but of disagreement. We agree to disagree. This is our “truth.” It makes us free to be what we are not. We are free to be our own self-makers and continuous self-remakers. We are free to deceive ourselves about the truth.

Rev. James V. Schall, S.J.

By

Rev. James V. Schall, S.J., (1928-2019) taught government at the University of San Francisco and Georgetown University until his retirement in 2012. Besides being a regular Crisis columnist since 1983, Fr. Schall wrote nearly 50 books including The Mind That Is Catholic from Catholic University of America Press; Remembering Belloc from St. Augustine Press; and Reasonable Pleasures from Ignatius Press. His later books include A Line Through the Human Heart: On Sinning and Being Forgiven (2016) and On the Principles of Taxing Beer and Other Brief Philosophical Essays (2017). His last books are Catholicism and Intelligence (Emmaus Road, 2017); The Universe We Think In (CUA Press, 2018); Run That By Me Again (Tan, 2018) and The Reason for the Season (Sophia Institute Press, 2018).

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)
MENU