Sense and Nonsense: October, Election Year

Every election year in Oc­tober, I write an “opinion.” My views have, astonishingly, been known to be wrong from time to time. I write under my academic hat as a political science professor, a mem­ber of a group likewise not known for prophetic accuracy, having been sur­prised both by the fall of communism and the rise of Islam.

Here is my pessimistic opinion: John Kerry will win with the help of a majority of Catholic votes, both clergy and laity. This is what happened in the Clinton years, our worst presidency. Kerry could be worse even than that. He’s actually more of an ideologue. The most probable estimate of his character is, “What the people want, I want, whatever it is.”

Crisis, I believe, thinks that most practicing Catholics will vote for Bush as they voted against Clin­ton. That is also true. The hidden premise, however, is the numbers of Catholics who do not “practice.” David Carlin, in The Decline and Fall of Roman Catholicism in America, main­tains that Catholics officially listed as 50 million or 60 million are vastly overestimated. There may be only 20 million to 25 million.

Most of the reasons Kerry’s Cath­olic supporters give for voting for him (especially as regards life issues) are options that would go against any sensible position on the dignity of human life. That seems like a closed case that even Kerry implicitly recognizes. But what about the “seamless garment” ar­gument? List all the great social issues Kerry is for and that Bush is against. You can try to balance things all you want, but it just doesn’t work. You still have to end up approving what cannot be approved.

 

On the other hand, many con­servatives, including Catholics, think Bush is a disaster—the war, the grow­ing government, social issues, diplo­macy. They don’t want to vote for either candidate. What elected Bush the first time was the heartland the mountain-to-mountain section of America. If he’s reelected, it will only be because he succeeded in winning them over again.

The Wall Street Journal wrote that the main issue in this election is “whether America treats terrorism as a problem of law enforcement or as an act of war.” It is an act of war, re­sponded to justly, and the president has clearly understood this from the beginning. The terrorists also under­stand quite well. Their dilemma is whether it’s possible to turn this into a Spanish election—that is, blow some­thing up close to the election to push Kerry to victory.

But terrorist leaders are prob­ably also clever enough to realize that this may backfire by proving that Bush has been right all along. This country was marvelously for­tunate that it was George W. Bush in the presidency when the wake- up call came on September 11. This was the terrorists’ greatest tactical mistake.

And what about the culture wars? We are, no doubt, losing them. Why? Because we don’t yet understand the logic of our position and the need to turn it into political force. With every election we slip from divorce, to contraception, to abortion, to fetal experimentation, to gay marriage, to surrogate parent­ing, to cloning. In reality, this is all the same issue rehashed in different ways, each manifestation worse than the former.

John Henry Cardinal Newman once said that in politics, one side is right and one wrong: “I am not saying which side is right and which is wrong, in the ever-varying course of social duty…. I only say there is a right and a wrong, that it is not a matter of indif­ference which side a man takes, that a man will be judged hereafter for the side he takes.”

This is my opinion, as well.

Rev. James V. Schall, S.J.

By

Rev. James V. Schall, S.J., (1928-2019) taught government at the University of San Francisco and Georgetown University until his retirement in 2012. Besides being a regular Crisis columnist since 1983, Fr. Schall wrote nearly 50 books including The Mind That Is Catholic from Catholic University of America Press; Remembering Belloc from St. Augustine Press; and Reasonable Pleasures from Ignatius Press. His later books include A Line Through the Human Heart: On Sinning and Being Forgiven (2016) and On the Principles of Taxing Beer and Other Brief Philosophical Essays (2017). His last books are Catholicism and Intelligence (Emmaus Road, 2017); The Universe We Think In (CUA Press, 2018); Run That By Me Again (Tan, 2018) and The Reason for the Season (Sophia Institute Press, 2018).

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)
MENU