From the Hill: Adult Stem-Cell Promise

In his papal encyclical Evangelium Vitae, Pope John Paul II warned the world community that “with the new prospects opened up by sci­entific and technological progress there arise new forms of attack on the dignity of the human being.”

We see this danger in the current debate over stem-cell research em­broiled in presidential election-year politics. Most stem-cell research uses cells obtained from adult tissue, um­bilical cord blood, and other sources that pose no moral problem. Stem cells from adult tissue and umbili­cal cord blood have proven benefits. Already they have been used to help people with Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injury, sickle-cell anemia, heart damage, corneal damage, and dozens of other conditions, and new treat­ment uses are still being found.

But the current political hype over embryonic stem cells is diverting our attention and our resources from the real progress already being made with non-embryonic stem cells. The Kerry campaign and other political figures are ignoring the facts, calling for more federal funding for embryonic stem- cell research, an approach that has yet to yield any medical breakthrough and poses a serious moral danger.

The Kerry-Edwards campaign and others claim that embryonic stem-cell research will lead to cures for many diseases, but this is largely specula­tion. These stem cells have never treat­ed a human patient.

 

President Bush allowed federal funding for embryonic stem-cell re­search under certain conditions in 2001. When the president made his decision to provide federal funding for research using existing embryonic stem-cell lines—involving previously destroyed embryos—he was comply­ing with legislative language passed by Congress each year since 1996 forbid­ding federal funding for any research that creates, injures, or destroys hu­man embryos.

While I differ with the president on funding the existing lines, it is worth noting that Senator Kerry is mislead­ing the public by claiming that the president “banned” embryonic stem- cell research. As the senator knows, privately funded embryonic stem-cell research is legal in the United States. And President Bush provided the first federal funding ever for this research. Moreover, the president provided $190.7 million in fiscal year 2003 for research using human non-embry­onic stem cells from adult tissue, cord blood, placenta, and bone marrow.

As a member of the bipartisan Senate Biotechnology Caucus, I am a strong supporter of advancing science and believe that Congress should con­tinue funding the many non-controversial research alternatives that are leading to life-saving therapies for a number of medical problems. At the same time, we can never justify taking human life to try to save another life.

The government’s funding priori­ties have a major impact on the direc­tion that medical research takes. While available research funds have been diverted toward exploring embryonic stem-cell research, some promising adult stem-cell avenues for treating ju­venile diabetes, spinal cord injury, and Parkinson’s disease have been under­funded. Many advances in these fields have emerged from other countries.

William Cardinal Keeler of Bal­timore, who chairs the U.S. Catholic bishops’ Committee for Pro-Life Ac­tivities, recently told appropriators in Congress, “If there is to be any change in the existing policy, it should be to end this limited funding of [embry­onic stem-cell research] altogether, so taxpayers’ resources can more ef­fectively be marshaled for research avenues that now appear to be more ethically and medically sound.”

With stem cells, it’s not a choice between science and ethics. We can and must have both

Sen. Rick Santorum

By

Former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania was a candidate for the Republican nomination for President in 2012. He is currently working in Dallas as head of the Christian movie company, EchoLight Studios.

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)
MENU