Late Edition: Cynical Citizens

Seldom has the nation seen a more desultory presidential campaign. With scarcely two months to go, the Republicans have yet to articulate a theme capable of firing the moral imagination of the electorate. Tax-cut talk, which was supposed to do the trick, has produced only yawns of indifference or skepticism, and on virtually every other issue in sight, Bill Clinton has masterfully co-opted the Republican agenda.

In fairness, it must be said that Dole and Kemp have a difficult task. The economy is in good shape, and the public seems blissfully indifferent to the odor of corruption emanating from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Senior GOP advisors have been debating how best to inject the “character” issue into the campaign but fear a voter backlash. Their caution finds support in poll numbers showing that while roughly three-fifths of the electorate distrust Bill Clinton, a healthy majority is neverthe­less prepared to re-elect him.

In an earlier and better age, the Morris scandal alone would have sent an incumbent President into a political tailspin. Dick Morris, after all, was no mere campaign “advisor” or “strategist.” He was by all accounts (not excluding his own) the undeniable puppetmaster of the Clinton re-election effort, the man who brought., the President from 20 points down to 20 points up.

What’s troubling about the Morris episode is not his sordid carryings-on with a prostitute, nor even his subsequent admission that he had fathered a child by a prior illicit liaison. All that is bad enough, but far worse is the reaction of political and intellectual elites, beginning with the President himself.

 

Within a day of Morris’s unceremonial departure from the Chicago convention, Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, as well as Vice-President Gore, had called him. Only they and Morris know for sure what they discussed, but nowhere in the public White House musings on the subject has there been any but the most perfunctory note of moral disapprobation. It was almost as if Morris were some kind of victim—we heard sniping about “tabloid journalism,” the untrustworthiness of the prostitute’s story, endless ruminations on “how the mighty have fallen,” but next to nothing about the wretched behavior that led to Morris’s downfall. Even Morris’s wife couldn’t bring herself to criticize the man whose long-standing sexual escapades with other women were broadcast to the world. She paraded with him arm-in-arm at a front-lawn press conference and even posed for a Time magazine photographer.

Within a matter of days, Random House announced that it had inked a $2.5 million book deal with Morris and, not to be outdone, the once venerable New Yorker featured Morris at a headliner luncheon for writers and advertisers—which makes you wonder what they would have done had they been able to lay their hands on the Marquis de Sade. Far from being shunned as a reprobate, Morris is being treated to full celebrity status. Can product endorsements and a TV mini-series be far behind?

It is a sad reflection on the state of the culture that we have come to such a pass. Our jaws drop in wonderment, but are we entitled to be surprised? In an age when the popular arts are chiefly notable for their indulgence of depravity, when schoolchildren are routinely informed that sexual preference is a matter of choice, and Heather can have as many mommies as her real mommy wants, who can claim surprise when a Dick Morris achieves fame and fortune?

What has disappeared in all this celebrity lather, of course, is even the slightest semblance of shame. Morris not only laughs all the way to the bank, but he is confirmed in his conviction that right and wrong are mere matters of personal taste and that those who speak of morality are so many hypocrites, cranks, or fools. When vice achieves honor and fortune, what need is there for virtue?

The Republicans have been reluctant to capitalize on l’affaire Morris, perhaps because they fear retaliatory exposes by the opposition against their own. But they need not dwell on Morris as such; in some respects, the less said about him the better. But the larger point about the condition of the culture needs to be made—that, as Burke said, “men are fitted for civil liberty in exact proportion to their capacity to place chains upon their own appetites.” A society unwilling to chastise the worst of its members will soon imitate them.

Errata “Slavery & Abortion” by Lewis Lehrman (September 1996) p. 25: Lehrman’s original manu­script reads as follows: “On all fronts slavery advanced, stronger in 1858 than in 1807, the year before the African slave trade was legally abolished.” Mr. Lehrman’s original sentence makes clear that the African slave trade was abol­ished in 1808. Due to an editorial error in setting up the final print­ing, Mr. Lehrman’s original sen­tence was inaccurately rendered in the final printing, thus implying incorrectly that the African slave trade was abolished in 1859.

Michael M. Uhlmann

By

Michael Martin Uhlmann (1939-2019) served as professor of government in the department of politics and policy at Claremont Graduate University and Claremont McKenna College. Prior to teaching at Claremont, Dr. Uhlmann was a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Vice President for Public Policy Research at the Bradley Foundation in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and taught at the George Mason University Law School.

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)
MENU