USCC Watch: A World Without the USCC

What would happen if the USCC suddenly ceased to exist? Imagine that, somehow, the building at 1312 Massachusetts Avenue simply vanished, complete with all its inhabitants. Imagine, further, that no mention of the disappearance appeared in the news. How quickly would ordinary Catholic Americans notice that something was missing?

No, this is not simply an outburst of wishful thinking. One way of appraising an organization’s impact is to consider what might happen in the absence of that organization. Some institutions would collapse almost immediately without central direction; others would continue on for some time before the strains began to show. Which sort of organization is the USCC? Within the USCC itself, which operations are vital, and which are expendable?

One point should be clear from the outset. Certainly the Catholic Church could survive without the USCC. Priests could still celebrate Mass, hear confessions, preside at weddings and funerals. In the overwhelming majority of American parishes, life would not noticeably change. CCD programs would continue uninterrupted; parish social events would proceed as usual; new monthly missalettes would appear in the pews on schedule. Nor would things be much different at the diocesan level. Bishops would continue to ordain, and to confirm, and in general to govern their dioceses. The sacramental life of the Church (and is anything else nearly so important?) would go on unimpeded.

Still, it would be going too far to say that the bishops’ conference has no useful purpose. Presumably the Vatican Council had some reason for encouraging (in the decree on bishops’ pastoral role) the development of such conferences. And while the Conciliar document is a bit vague as to what exactly episcopal conferences should do, the new Code of Canon Law makes explicit provisions for them. Clearly, the universal Church sees a need for these groupings.


What is that need? The conciliar document Christus Dominus makes it reasonably clear that the episcopal conference exists to stimulate cooperation among the bishops of a nation: “Thus, when the insights of prudence and experience have been shared and views exchanged, there will emerge a holy union of energies in the service of the common good of the churches.” Each episcopal conference is directed to convene the member bishops at least once annually for this purpose.

So the first and least controversial function of the USCC is to set up meetings of the American bishops. As I write this column, our bishops are packing for their annual meeting in Collegeville, Minnesota. Surely bishops can learn a great deal from each other, and Collegeville provides the opportunity for them to do so. But the Collegeville meeting does not happen by itself; staff people handle all the logistics. If the USCC disappeared, the Collegeville meeting would not take place. Perhaps ordinary parishioners would not notice the difference, but bishops would.

But that one task—planning one or two annual meetings—doesn’t justify the existence of an organization the size of the USCC. What other vital functions does the USCC fulfill? Taking the bull by the horns, I visited 1312 Massachusetts Avenue (the building has not vanished), and spoke with Russell Shaw, the USCC’s public-affairs director. What, I asked, would happen if the USCC disappeared?

Mr. Shaw paused for only a few seconds, then speculated that if the USCC vanished today, the bishops would begin reconstructing a similar organization tomorrow. Why? Because the USCC performs important functions for the bishops. When I pressed for a list of those functions, Mr. Shaw too began with the task of arranging meetings for the bishops. Along the same lines, he noted that if Pope John Paul decides to visit our country again, some central organization must be ready to handle the welter of logistical problems that such a visit provokes.

But Shaw continued: if one admits that the bishops might want to issue a joint pastoral letter, then some staff members will be involved in preparing and publishing that letter; if one admits the value of a national catechetical directory, some group must administer that program as well; if one admits the need for a nationwide charitable campaign, some agency must collect and distribute the funds. The Vatican Council anticipated that episcopal conferences would help administer social programs on a national level; again, the USCC would seem the logical agency. And so on.

Fair enough. On some other occasion we could debate the virtues of the staff contributions to the pastoral letters, or the catechetical directory, or the bishops’ charitable campaigns. For now, I wanted to press Mr. Shaw on a different sort of question: How long would it take ordinary Catholics to notice the USCC’s disappearance? After some discussion, we agreed that the first evidence would turn up in diocesan newspapers. Most local Catholic papers rely heavily on National Catholic News Service for their reporting; without that service (which comes from 1312 Mass. Avenue), many diocesan papers would be reduced to only a few pages’ worth of news. (Since he is an honest man, Shaw also pointed out that perceptive Catholics might also notice a drop in the number of special collections taken up at Sunday Mass.)

Very few Catholics, I suspect, would begrudge the bishops their right to have a national staff. Journalists can vouch for the importance of the National Catholic newswire, and countless reporters (including this one) appreciate the fact that the USCC public-affairs department is ready to answer queries. Without question, the USCC can be a great convenience.

But a convenience is not a necessity. And to say that some USCC operations are worthwhile certainly does not mean that all divisions of the clerical bureaucracy are vital. If any bishop is interested in reforming the USCC, he should keep one comforting thought in mind: If a few, staff aides—or a few offices—disappear from USCC headquarters, most ordinary Catholics will never notice the difference.

Philip Lawler


Born and raised in the Boston area, Phil Lawler attended Harvard College, graduating with honors in Government in 1972. He did graduate work in political philosophy at the University of Chicago before entering a career in journalism. He has been Director of Studies for the Heritage Foundation, a member of two presidential inaugural committees; and a candidate for the US Senate. As a journalist, Phil has acted as editor of Crisis magazine. In 1986 he became the first layman to edit The Pilot, the Boston archdiocesan newspaper. From 1993 through 2005, Phil Lawler was the editor of Catholic World Report, an international monthly news magazine. And in 1996, recognizing the power of the internet, he founded Catholic World News: the first online Catholic news service. Phil Lawler is the author of five books on political and religious topics. He has recently completed a new book titled "The Faithful Departed: The Collapse of Boston's Catholic Culture". His essays, book reviews, and editorial columns have appeared in over 100 newspapers around the United States and abroad, including the Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, and Boston Globe. Phil lives in central Massachusetts with his wife Leila and their seven children.

Crisis Magazine Comments Policy

This is a Catholic forum. As such:

  1. All comments must directly address the article. “I tell you, on the day of judgment men will render account for every careless word they utter.” (Matthew 12:36)
  2. No profanity, ad hominems, hot tempers, or racial or religious invectives. “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32)
  3. We will not tolerate heresy, calumny, or attacks upon our Holy Mother Church or Holy Father. “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)
  4. Keep it brief. No lengthy rants or block quotes. “For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes.” (James 4:14)
  5. If you see a comment that doesn’t meet our standards, please flag it so a moderator may remove it. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.” (Galatians 6:1)
  6. All comments may be removed at the moderators’ discretion. “But of that day and hour no one knows…” (Matthew 24:36)
  7. Crisis isn’t responsible for the content of the comments box. Comments do not represent the views of Crisis magazine, its editors, authors, or publishers. “Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you despise your brother? For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God… So each of us shall give account of himself to God.” (Romans 14:10, 12)