Ending the USCCB’s Path to Progressive Politics?

johncarr

After 25 years of faithful service, John Carr, executive director of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Department of Justice, Peace, and Human Development, retired last month. In a personal note circulated among his colleagues—which was later posted online—Carr wrote that he was “leaving the USCCB, not to end my service to the Church, but to serve in new ways—to help form, convene, and encourage Catholic lay men and women to take up their unique task of bringing Catholic social and moral teaching to community and political life.”

Throughout the last year of his tenure at the USCCB, Carr was under siege from the secular left because he has supported the bishops in their lawsuit against the HHS mandate to provide contraceptive care—including abortifacients and sterilization services—to employees of Catholic institutions. Carr has responded to these attacks courageously.

This fall, Carr will begin a fellowship on faith in public life at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government—a position that will give him some time to decide where he will bring his passion for social justice to “form, convene, and encourage” the Catholic laity. But the choice of the Kennedy School reveals that Carr may already have chosen to continue the path to progressive politics chosen by so many of his predecessors when they left the USCCB. In fact, the USCCB has provided a kind of training ground for many progressive Catholics currently working to help elect liberal-leaning candidates for office—including candidates who support policies that will expand abortion availability and same-sex marriage.

Sara Morello, executive vice president of Catholics for Choice, worked for the USCCB prior to her current position at the pro-abortion organization founded by self-described “former nun” Frances Kissling. According to the Catholics for Choice website, Morello—who holds a licentiate in canon law from the Catholic University of America in Washington, DC and a bachelor’s degree in theology from Creighton University—“brings her expertise in canon law, theology, church structure and governance to inform CFC work as well as that of its partners and colleagues.” In other words, Morello is using her graduate degree from a Catholic university and her experience at the USCCB to provide canon law cover for Catholics who wish to support abortion with a clear conscience.

Throughout her long tenure at Catholics for Choice, Morello developed many of the organization’s core publications. In Conscience, the Catholics for Choice flagship publication, Morello published an article in 2003 titled “Pro-Choice Politics and Church Law,” which purported to tell readers “what canon law actually says.” Morello advised her readers, “Although getting an abortion is against the Church’s law, the law itself is more complex and nuanced than many would expect…Catholic politicians should take comfort in the fact that their rights as a Catholic cannot be restricted unless the church law specifically says so, or unless a bishop or the pope takes punitive action. And, almost without exception, neither the bishops nor the pope have taken punitive action against Catholic policy makers who have expressed pro-choice views or cast pro-choice votes.” Morello concludes that “what canon law says about abortion is also complemented by the church’s other teachings, which can be found in scripture, the teaching of church councils like Vatican II, as well as the teachings of the popes throughout history, and from bishops and theologians.” For Morello, “changes over the years to theology and law underscore the responsibility of Catholics to form their own consciences through inquiry and study, not merely reliance on one priest or bishop’s teaching—or threats.”

Morello isn’t the only former USCCB employee to align herself with pro-abortion causes. Long-time USCCB employee Alexia Kelley—currently the director of the Center for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships at the US Department of Health and Human Services—works with the pro-abortion Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and was instrumental in helping to pass President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, which included funding for abortion and lacked conscience protections for health care providers. During her 10-year tenure at the USCCB’s Catholic Campaign for Human Development, Kelley worked with Carr to funnel more than $7 million of parishioners’ donations to the scandal-ridden organization ACORN—the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

In 2005, Kelley was among the founders of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, a George Soros-supported advocacy group which was created to help elect progressive candidates to office. During the 2008 presidential campaign, Kelley teamed with James Salt and Christ Korzen, leaders of Catholics United (another progressive Catholic advocacy organization), to help neutralize the abortion issue by casting it in pro-Democratic Party terms—claiming that reducing poverty was the best way to reduce abortion.

Kelley was joined at Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good by other colleagues from the USCCB, including John Gehring, Tom Chabolla, and Francis Xavier Doyle. Gehring parlayed his position as assistant media director at the USCCB to a communications position at Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. Today, working as senior writer and Catholic outreach coordinator at Jim Wallis’ Soros-supported Faith in Public Life, Gehring frequently criticizes the same bishops he once worked for at the USCCB. Gehring is assisted in the media offices of Faith in Public Life by Nick Sementelli, another former employee of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, who appears to be taking the role of point-person in an attack on the authority of the bishops. His most recent blog posts at the Faith in Public Life website illustrate his willingness to ridicule what he calls the “confusion” among American bishops. Sementelli’s post “Catholic Bishop Contradicts USCCB; Wishes Health Care Law Were Repealed”, for example, attempts to show dissension among the bishops on the Affordable Care Act.

Like Alexia Kelley, Tom Chabolla worked at the USCCB’s Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) before he went to work as the assistant to the president of the SEIU, the Service Employees International Union. Chabolla currently serves as one of several union leaders on the Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good Advisory Board. It is understandable that Chabolla was hired by the president of the SEIU, considering the fact that ACORN, a political ally of the SEIU that shared financial and leadership ties with the union, was the beneficiary of millions of parishioners’ dollars through the CCHD.

Perhaps the highest level “graduate” of the USCCB to enter progressive politics through Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good path is Francis Xavier Doyle. Serving at the USCCB for 24 years, Doyle was the associate general secretary of the USCCB before he became the treasurer-secretary of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. In this capacity, Doyle played an important role in helping to pass the Affordable Care Act. Publicly identifying himself as “a former associate general secretary of the USCCB”—implying that he credibly speaks for Catholics—Doyle joined Sister Simone Campbell, the director of the national Catholic social justice lobby Network, to promote President Obama’s health care reform. In a teleconference sponsored by Faith in Public Life on March 18, 2010, Doyle used his long tenure at the USCCB to imply Catholic support for the Affordable Care Act, noting that “Catholic teaching has long promoted universal health care as a fundamental human right.… No legislation is perfect, but this legislation is the first step in reforming a broken system.”

Whether John Carr continues down the progressive political path that so many of his predecessors at the USCCB have taken remains to be seen. But at Harvard, Carr will join progressive professors he knew well during his tenure at the USCCB. Rev. J. Bryan Hehir, a long-time leader within the bishops’ conference who served as the associate secretary for International Justice and Peace office, now serves as the Parker Gilbert Montgomery Professor of the Practice of Religion and Public Life at Harvard. In a recent article for First Things, George Weigel described Father Hehir as being part of the USCCB “Bernardin Machine,” named after the Chicago cardinal who led a powerful network of progressive prelates that dominated the affairs of the American hierarchy—and the bishops’ conference—for more than two decades. Weigel wrote that “Hehir and Bernardin shared an ecclesiology that was sympathetic to the progressive wing of the post-conciliar spectrum.”

Besides Father Hehir, Carr will also join Kennedy School Professor Mary Jo Bane—a progressive Catholic who was often called upon by the USCCB as an expert on poverty issues. Bane is also a favorite speaker at Voice of the Faithful conferences because she advocates a complete restructuring of the hierarchy of the Church—giving more power to the laity in choosing their pastors and bishops. Voice of the Faithful does not recognize the authority of bishops to head their dioceses and continues to lobby for renewal of the structure of the Catholic Church—diminishing the authority of the clergy. Bane, who helped then-Governor Mario Cuomo implement his policy on state-funding for abortion when she worked for him as commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, also served as the Assistant Secretary for Children and Families in the Clinton administration from 1993-1996. In 2008, Bane served as part of President Obama’s Catholic advisory team.

Many observers believe that Carr has already established himself as part of that same progressive “Bernardin Machine” to which Doyle, Gehring, Kelley, and Morello belonged. Carr’s long tenure at the USCCB has been marked by scandal; his office made the funding decisions for Catholic Campaign for Human Development grants—some of which went to organizations that promote abortion and same-sex marriage. Last year, it was revealed that, while working for the USCCB, Carr concurrently chaired the board of the Center for Community Change, an organization that has received $150,000 from the CCHD despite the fact that the organization is involved in pro-abortion activities. Although Carr ended his affiliation with the Center for Community Change in 2005, he spent more than two decades working for the group.

Still, it is possible that Carr will avoid the pro-choice politics that so many of his colleagues at the USCCB pursued. In his farewell note, Carr acknowledged the challenges he faced from “polarized politics and false choices that ask us to choose between defense of the unborn and the protection of poor.” It is possible that despite his choice to pursue the fellowship at Harvard’s Kennedy School, Carr may understand better than his progressive predecessors at the USCCB that one can bridge the gap between protection of the poor and defending the unborn.

Claiming in his farewell note that sometimes he feels “politically homeless,” Carr seems to be rejecting the default path to progressive politics that so many of his USCCB predecessors took. Having been criticized by some progressives for his defense of the bishops in their HHS lawsuit, it is possible that the courageous Carr will be better able than some of his former USCCB colleagues to resist the pressure to promote policies that fail to protect the unborn. Carr has suggested that “we need places and strategies to advance a consistent vision of defending human life and dignity.” We can hope that Carr will someday find a home where he can do just that.

This essay first appeared September 4, 2012 in Catholic World Report and is reprinted with permission.

Anne Hendershott

By

Anne Hendershott is Professor of Sociology and Director of the Veritas Center at Franciscan University in Steubenville, Ohio. She is the author of Status Envy: The Politics of Catholic Higher Education; The Politics of Abortion; and The Politics of Deviance (Encounter Books). She is also the co-author of Renewal: How a New Generation of Priests and Bishops are Revitalizing the Catholic Church (2013).

  • rtjl


    Catholic politicians should take comfort in the fact that their rights as a Catholic cannot be restricted unless the church law specifically says so, or unless a bishop or the pope takes punitive action… changes over the years to theology and law underscore the responsibility of Catholics to form their own consciences through inquiry and study, not merely reliance on one priest or bishop’s teaching—or threats. ”

    Bishops – pay attention to what she is saying. If you only threaten to punish you won’t be taken seriously. But if you actually punish you will be. Sounds like a challenge to me.

  • verbummilitant

    This article can be summed up in just four words. WHERE ARE OUR BISHOPS?

    • Dawn

      Unfortunately, they are doing comedy routines with secular progressives and people who stand to destroy the very foundations of our beliefs. This is not a laughing matter!!!! Jesus wants us to admonish the sinner, not do photo ops with him.

  • Pingback: Ending the USCCB’s Path to Progressive Politics? | Catholic Canada

  • rlp

    Ms. Hendershott makes the all too common and consistent assumption that mr. carr operates from some sincere and deeply felt conscience formed by Catholicism after decades of weaseling and twisting moral justification of the unjustifiable. It’s the same rotten justification that drove Bishop Dolan and so many of our Catholic ‘leaders’ excuse the moral bankruptcy of Kennedy, Pelosi, Biden, etc. and our current president. They delude themselves that will somehow these moral reprobates will grow a conscience and change his pro-abortion stripes or deal with them in good conscience despite decades of acting otherwise. In the meantime, the abortions continue, moral compromise expands and the authority and majesty of the Church erodes.

  • http://profiles.google.com/dr.paolucci Dr. Rocco Paolucci

    The USCCB is an “evil” organization. (Yes, there are a few good Bishops in their midst, such as Archbishop Chaput, but many are cowards and do not deserve respect from the faithful laity). We cannot wait for many of them to “retire”, as some would have it, they need to be removed and ex-communicated…. NOW! But it won’t happen, the Vatican herself is controlled by a nest of vipers.

    http://www.CFCF.us

    • Verbummilitant

      Dr., you sound like a good man who is frustrated with our Bishops; just like most faithful Catholics. However, do not let the current darkness swallow you up. Pray the rosary asking the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Our Blessed Mother to interceed on our behalf, and then; Trust in His Mercy.
      I fear it is going to get much darker before it inevitably becomes light again. His beloved Daughter, His ever virgin Spouse, His Mother weeps. This will not stand!!!!

  • JP

    It appears to me that the USCCB’s raison d’etre has been to provide employment to Progressive activists. Sounds like a nice gig if you can get it.

  • MarkRutledge

    OK, Mr. Carr is leaving. Any chance an orthodox Catholic will finally step into that role? Yes, apparently this has happened. Please pray for Dr. Reyes.

  • Scott S

    A fine essay, Anne, very timely.
    It appears that the CINO’s, Cathoics in Name Only can be at the upper clerical and management echelons of our church and the USCCB, not just among our political leaders, V.P.Biden, Sibelius, Nancy Polosi, et al.
    Thank you, it also helps me understand how the grevious evil of predator, pedophile, primarily homosexual clergy was tolerated and hidden from justice for a generation; the responsibility lay on our bishops and lay church management.

  • Pingback: THURSDAY EVENING EDITION | Big Pulpit

  • Alecto

    I would like to understand better how the USCCB is funded? How is money appropriated among these departments? How are decisions about hiring and placement in the various departments made?

    • Alecto

      I found the audited financial statements of the USCCB on its website:

      http://www.usccb.org/about/financial-reporting/upload/2010-and-2011-Statements.pdf

      The USCCB 2011 audited financial statement lists $67 million derived from government contracts and grants income, the single largest revenue item, compared with $10 million in “diocesan assessments” and $8+ million from investment income (Do bishops hedge portfolios with long volatility positions?) ;)

      In addition, the 2011 statement includes approximately $40 million in expenditures for “Communications, policy and advocacy” initiatives versus $76 million to program “grants and donations” and $57 million in “sub-recipient government contract” expenditures. No wonder the bishops drool over the vast expansion of the federal government.

      In answer to the question below, “WHERE ARE OUR BISHOPS?” The answer is: “ON THE PUBLIC DOLE!”

      • John200

        Revolting. Thank you for your good work on this.

      • Dawn

        Eye opening and heart breaking. I now understand why this body of men appears to ignor the incontrovertible principles of our faith. They are hiding them under a pile of government money.

  • Bill Russell

    “IT’S
    NOT LIKE WE’RE IN A CRISIS; IT’S NOT LIKE ALL OF A SUDDEN WE NEED SOME DARING NEW INITIATIVES. THINGS ARE
    GOING WELL“

    Archbishop
    Timothy Dolan on election as President of USCCB

  • John Oneill

    For most faithful Catholics who struggle to keep their faith in this very secular and anti Christian American State, the USCCB is irrelevant. The fact that Carr is now working at the Kennedy school in Harvard tells all; he is a member of the American Kennedy Catholic Church; we members of the Roman Catholic Church have nothing in common with Carr and his rich democrat friends.

  • Joanne S.

    I would still like to know who controls the editorial that goes in the diocesan newspapers. Ostensibly the publisher is the local bishop, so why is it these newspapers are filled with social justice boilerplate when, oftentimes, the bishop is supposedly traditional? Why aren’t we getting articles about the “non-negotiables” in this election instead of generalities about Faithful Citizenship? I know the head of our social justice department in my archdiocese, and he is admittedly “progressive.” He tells Obama is going to be re-elected as if he knows something. It gets scarier every day, but I’m trying very hard to put my anxieties aside and trust in the Divine Mercy.

  • bobbylang

    OH Boy!! What a disgusting, and evil group?
    I’d say better gone BUT I’d like to see who gets the “nod” from the “USCCB” as replacements??
    So far the “USCCB” has proven not only “flawed” but seems to be fundamentally off course!
    I fear any hope of correction,from the new “Cardinal” Dolan, will prove to be the antithesis of responsible Catholicity !!
    God save us from our Bishops, and!!

  • Pingback: Catholic bishops: Don’t vote for candidates like Obama | The Oregon Catalyst

MENU