• Get Crisis in your Inbox

  • Profanity and Pop Music

    by L. Brent Bozell III

     

    Profanity and pop music go hand in hand these days. The pop star Rihanna recently appeared on the British version of Simon Cowell’s singing competition The X Factor dressed in a demure plaid jumper with a prim white collar. It seemed like a bow to younger viewers (and their parents). But a glance at her black sneakers and the mood was shattered: She’d inscribed the words “F—- off.”

    On her blog, The Record, NPR music critic Ann Powers declared this little stunt exemplified an undeniable reality: “21st century pop music is very dirty.” In fact, “2011 saw so much boundary-breaking in pop that the lines seem forever pulled down.”

    Powers made quite a list. There were several underground rap hits that graphically celebrated oral sex. There were top 100 pop songs about sex addiction, the “cowgirl” sexual position, even sex with extraterrestrials. (In the last example, Katy Perry in “E.T.” insisted her alien lover “Infect me with your love and fill me with your poison. …Wanna be a victim, ready for abduction.”) Putting a woman on a pedestal is archaic. Degradation is a requirement.

    The country singer Luke Bryan boasted he was listening to hip-hop music when he came up with his 2011 anthem to exotic female dancing, “Country Girl (Shake It for Me).” Bryan recently performed the song on the TV broadcast of the Country Music Awards, complete with a bevy of booty-shaking, leather-clad dancers. The song is overtly sexual, although it didn’t need anyone at ABC to hit a bleep button.

    The Powers list ended with Lady Gaga, and I’m counting the days ’til the bloom wears off and she fades … away. In the meantime, she’s everywhere. She appeared at the New York “Jingle Ball” on Dec. 9 hosted by the pop radio station Z-100. She performed “White Christmas” scantily clad, sitting on the seat of a motorcycle. She explained to the audience that she wrote an additional verse. “I think it’s too short. Just when I get into it, it stops. It’s like a really bad orgasm.” That’s when some parents took their children and headed for the exit.

    Gaga closed out the song by laying down on the motorcycle seat, doing several upward pelvic thrusts and then spreading her legs while exclaiming, “Santa, I’ll do anything for you!”

    This matched Gaga’s other Christmas stunt, releasing a simple, stupid new song on Dec. 25 blatantly titled “Stuck on F—-in’ You.” It dropped the F-bomb five times. The Huffington Post loved it: “Think of her as a raw, hyper-sexualized Santa Claus, slinking down the chimney to mingle with the flames of your yule log.”

    The aerobic desperation in this woman’s urge to offend must be exhausting. What’s worse is how some entertainment writers wallow in this musical sludge, as if Beethoven was reincarnated.

    NPR’s Powers, without really condemning this morality-shredding trend, underlined its intensity: “Pop has hardly just developed this pretty potty mouth. But never have so many artists spilled profanity so blissfully or embraced salaciousness with such ease. There’s a sort of carefree, cheerful quality about such naughtiness now.”

    The good cheer in the profanity isn’t always obvious,but it’s definitely carefree. Music stars and their promoters don’t really fear the Federal Communications Commission, since young people have migrated away from FCC-regulated broadcast TV and radio to get their songs downloaded directly from iTunes. They watch the videos on their laptops, iPads and smart phones. Powers turned to professor Kembrew McLeod to proclaim, “The graphic language boundary pushing has much to do with the fact that kids now listen to music largely through unfiltered sources like YouTube, which the FCC doesn’t touch.”

    Powers concluded this whole shock epidemic is a sign “of the fantasies we share but don’t always know now to handle, of the arguments that were begun and never finished, and of the conversations we still desperately need to have.” That sounds profound for a second. But it suggests that the profanity and the sexploitation it often describes might just be socially uplifting.

    Can anyone imagine a parent being grateful for having to explain to a grade-school child what Katy Perry meant by “melt your Popsicle”? Sleazy pop songs might be a conversation starter, but as a warning about how not to speak or behave. There’s no happy talk that can avoid this fact: The music industry slides lower each year into the gutter, interested only in making a quick buck through our lowest common denominators.

    COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

    The views expressed by the authors and editorial staff are not necessarily the views of
    Sophia Institute, Holy Spirit College, or the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts.

    Print this   |   Share this

    • G.

      It is appalling how much modern “art” (music, visual art, film, theater) consists of wallowing in a dark, nihilistic sexuality. And this immersion in coarseness and brutality is said to have no actual effect on society. I’ve heard its defenders plead that it’s “real,” and “art imitates life”: surely never the other way around.

      And yes, there is a supply meeting a demand, though the nature of the supply has changed gradually and the tolerance of the audience has been gradually increased. When demand dries up, the supply will dry up. But the problem is that this has become “normal.”

      In the meantime, all we need to complete the picture is the “Evil is good” choir from Eddie Murphy’s “Vampire in Brooklyn.” At least they were forthright about their message.

    • http://catholicismpure.wordpress.com teresa

      The best solution: don’t listen to pop music, listen to classic music. Indeed I don’t know who Rihana is. I invite all to do the same, just trash all what belongs into the bin.

      • Sarto

        Amen, Teresa. It takes some education to understand classical music but it is worth it. And then, if you possibly can, attend concerts by a good symphony orchestra. After you see the subtle and amazing complexity being created right before your eyes, you will never listen to pop the same way.

    • http://beautifulexile.blogspot.com/ Dan

      While it’s important to acknowledge the decadence of a large percentage of mainstream popular music, I think it’s also important to avoid making generalizations like: “The music industry slides lower each year into the gutter, interested only in making a quick buck through our lowest common denominators.”

      There have been a number of great releases this year that express the longings of the human spirit in truly artistic and profound ways. A few albums that come to mind are Fleet Foxes “Helplessness Blues” and Bon Iver’s self-titled album.

      In more mainstream music, there are plenty of examples of artists who have found stunning success without selling out to degradation. Examples include the best-selling album of the year, Adele’s “21″, as well as the continued super-stardom of artists such as Taylor Swift and Coldplay.

      Perhaps instead of focusing on the schlock (Lady Gaga, Katy Perry, etc.), let’s give credit to and applaud the artists who are sifting and searching their souls, and channeling it into their music with incredible results. Instead of discrediting a hugely influential industry (whose relevance is here to stay) with a negative blanket statement, let’s acknowledge and celebrate the artists who are doing great things. Just as with popular movies and books, popular music is a medium that must be taken seriously by Catholics. Let’s start making the effort to critique it in constructive, non-dismissive ways.

    • Tony Esolen

      Dan, maybe you have the time to do that. Most of us don’t. The payoff isn’t great enough. We could say the same thing about movies. Yes, every year there’s a new movie or two that are worth watching. But it is hard to wade through the sludge, and even at that, the cloacal anticulture pervades even the good movies like a dank mist. I watched There Be Dragons last spring with my wife and several of the good folks from Providence College. It was worth seeing. I wouldn’t see it again, though, because the movie still resembled sewer-movies in ways I have grown weary of. It was often vulgar. It entertained (but rejected) nihilism. It stressed technical virtuosity over the human situation. I thought it was a very fine movie, but I didn’t LIKE it. And I am too old now to want to wade through swill in order to find one pearl — and when I do find the pearl, it isn’t exactly a pearl, either.