• Subscribe to Crisis

  • Confirm Thy Soul in Self Control

    by Paul Kengor

    I encourage you to set aside the burgers and dogs and soda and beer for a moment this Fourth of July and contemplate something decidedly different, maybe even as you gaze upward at the flash of fireworks. Here it is: Confirm thy soul in self-control.

    What do I mean by that? Let me explain.

    The founders of this remarkable republic often thought and wrote about the practice of virtue generally and self-control specifically, two things long lost in this modern American culture of self. Thomas Jefferson couldn’t avoid a reference to one of the cardinal virtues — prudence — in our nation’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence, which, incidentally, ought to be a must-read for every American every Fourth of July (it’s only 1,800 words). Our first president and ultimate Founding Father, George Washington, knew the necessity of governing one’s self before a nation’s people were capable of self-governance. As Washington stated in his classic Farewell Address, “’Tis substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government.”

    A forgotten philosopher who had an important influence on the American Founders was the Frenchman Charles Montesquieu, whose work included the seminal book, The Spirit of the Laws (1748). Montesquieu considered various forms of government. In a tyrannical system, people are prompted not by freedom of choice or any expression of public virtue but, instead, by the sheer coercive power of the state, whether by decree of an individual despot or an unaccountable rogue regime. That’s no way for human beings to live. There’s life under such a system, yes, but not much liberty or pursuit of happiness; even life itself is threatened.

    Montesquieu concluded that the best form of government is a self-governing one, and yet it is also the most difficult to maintain because it demands a virtuous populace. As noted by John Howard – the outstanding senior fellow at the Howard Center for Family, Religion, & Society — Montesquieu noted that each citizen in a self-governing state must voluntarily abide by certain essential standards of conduct: lawfulness, truthfulness, honesty, fairness, respect for the rights and well-being of others, obligation to one’s spouse and children, to name a few.

    “Each new generation must be trained to be responsible citizens … to be virtuous and conscientious,” writes Howard in The St. Croix Review. “Once the free society is well-established, the daily life of the family and the society is such that becoming virtuous is not a monstrous chore for the young people.”

    Sadly, becoming virtuous has indeed become a monstrous chore in a society not only lacking virtue but eschewing virtue — fleeing virtue like a vampire fleeing a cross. Living life in a good way — what Benedict Groeschel calls The Virtue Driven Lifebecomes so alien that the people prefer darkness over light. When virtues are not taught — whether at home, at school, or by America’s educator-in-chief, the TV set — they become unknown and ignored and unfulfilled, desiccated and dead upon the national landscape.

    And perhaps saddest of all, as John Howard notes, virtue is something that can be acquired, like learning to speak a culture’s language. Once inculcated, however, it needs to be continuously reinforced by the cultural elements of the society. Virtue needs to be nourished, like fruitful plants need water and sunlight. Says Howard emphatically: “I want to repeat…. Virtue must be continuously reinforced by the culture.”

    We Americans might not think about this much, but we actually sing it fairly often, even if the words don’t sink in. Consider this line from one of our sacred political hymns, America, the Beautiful:

    America, America,
    God mend thine ev’ry flaw,
    Confirm thy soul in self-control,
    Thy liberty in law.

    That’s the ticket: Confirm thy soul in self-control. Our liberty is enshrined in our laws, but liberty should not be license for opportunities for the flesh. Our liberties, protected and permitted as they are, should not be exploited to do anything and everything we want, including things harmful to oneself, to one’s family, to one’s neighbors, to one’s culture, to one’s country. That misunderstanding and abuse of freedom is what Pope Benedict XVI calls a “confused ideology of freedom,” one that can engender “the self-destruction of freedom” for others.

    In truth, a genuine freedom requires responsibility. As the song says — and as Washington and Montesquieu intimated — we must successfully govern ourselves in order to successfully govern our nation.

    It’s a timeless concept worth remembering this Fourth of July and every day going forward.

     

    COPYRIGHT 2011 THE CENTER FOR VISION & VALUES

    The views expressed by the authors and editorial staff are not necessarily the views of
    Sophia Institute, Holy Spirit College, or the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts.

    Subscribe to Crisis

    (It's Free)

    Go to Crisis homepage

    • Anders13

      I agree with everything in your article and have seem those ideas in many conservative comments for other articles. However liberals always reject those ideas and insist on a secular candidate or secular point of view. So I am trying to concoct a logical argument for holding on to Christian moral principles in government. What do you think?
      The one thing that every political system must do is administer justice. To administer justice is to punish those who don’t follow system rules ; that is to administer justice is to cause suffering. The crucial question is who is responsible for the suffering? Is it the judge or the law? If the judge rules according to the law then responsibility passes to the law, otherwise it falls on the judge. If according to the law then responsibility passes to the enactors of the law. If the enactors acted in accord with Christian moral principles then responsibility passes to the word of God and God himself. Therefore God is ultimately responsible for the suffering. Christians know that God is always good so justice is served and the issue stops here. Neither the state, the individual, nor the community is diminished.
      For the unchristian there is no justice and the issue continues. Unchristians divide into factions; factions supporting the punishment and those opposing the punishment. Each time justice acts, factional differences intensify and factions multiply. The voice of any entity , such as the state or the general will of the people, attempting to carry the ultimate weight justice will eventually become mute. A political system that rejects Christian moral principles eventually looses it’s ability to administer justice and thus leaves society with only natural law. Nature’s law without nature’s God reduces to the law of the jungle. Violence and revolution produce a new cycle and a new set of issues. It’s like repeating the French revolution over and over.
      Those who love God and practice the golden rule have peace among themselves and thus are able to stand undivided in protecting their faith and their freedom.