I Am Woman

 

“So what do you do?” I’m asked over
drinks at a recent party.
 
I mentally flip through a list of possible responses. I hesitate, considering my interrogator. I think I remember someone mentioning he works as a neurosurgeon.
 
He performs brain surgery. I wipe little bottoms.
 



So here’s my quandary: Do I come clean and admit I’m “just” an at-home mom? Do I mention I went to law school (there’s no need to bring up the fact that I dropped out after a month to support my husband through medical school)? Do I opt for a smart-alecky response? “I breathe. I read. I shower (almost daily). I nibble at my nails when I’m anxious (hence, the nibbling right now). What do you do?”
 
Or do I simply pretend I’m still a productive member of society and forget the fact that my nursing baby is tugging on my blouse, ready for a drink of her own?
 
On a good day, I’d come clean and confess I’m an at-home mom. On a really good day, I’d say it with pride.
 
Sometimes, though, especially when I’m surrounded by my husband’s colleagues — who generally are physicians, esteemed researchers, or other professionals with impressive accolades — I’m not as confident. I waffle. I mention motherhood in passing like it’s my side job, instead of conveying what I really believe: that this mothering gig is a genuine vocation, a way of bending to God’s will for my life, as well as the best way for me to use my gifts.
 
While most people respect my decision and the fact that I’m blessed to be able to be a stay-at-home mom, I have the feminists — the people who are supposed to be on my side — to thank for my occasional stabs of insecurity. Like many of my female peers, college classes in women’s studies and multiculturalism indoctrinated me with “culturally correct” beliefs, where the big picture seemed to be lost in a quibble over who suffered more prejudice and who the real victims were. It was easy to see any “softness” in my personality as a point of weaknesses that needed to be hardened if I wanted to be a success.
 
It was the feminists who made me feel like less instead of more. The same women who warned us about never allowing a man to turn us into Barbie were furtively turning us into Ken — and ladies, Ken doesn’t wear an apron or change diapers all day. The same women who praised motherhood (when it was convenient and the time was “right”) were telling us we didn’t have to just be moms confined to a life of domestic drudgery. We had the potential to be so much more (who cares if there’s only 24 hours in the day?).
 
It is the feminists and their unflagging campaigns for “equity for women” who continue to lead so many women to question what God designed us to do, who make us want to be more like our rational (and less intuitive) male counterparts, who make us wonder why we don’t have it all — as in a career that provides manifold satisfactions and an identity other than “Mommy.”
 
They’ll disagree, of course. The feminists will swear they’re all about choice and helping women make an impact on the world through their work and their lives while remaining true to themselves.
 
They’re more than willing to share the secret formula to doing this, too. You evolve into the modern woman — the woman who can do it all and have it all.
 
 
While early feminism sought to encourage the rise of women through support of their traditional roles as mothers and champions for virtue, many of today’s feminists say, “Forget that namby-pamby traditional stuff. Get a career. Then a hubby. Then maybe have a baby (if it will make you happy). Keep the career. Hire a physical trainer and get a great postpartum body (but not too great, lest you be considered an object), make money, wield power, and keep your husband in line. Oh, and make sure he’s someone who does his own laundry and sometimes yours.”
 
As I’ve grown into my mothering shoes and become more confident in my role, I’ve started to see that modern feminists and their dedication to gender equity, their “I am woman, hear me roar” mantras, and their push for women to balance careers, family, and a hobby or two or three aren’t really about being female or male, or even human. They’re really about being superhuman.
 
It’s all those courageous, outspoken modern feminists who, instead of concentrating their time and efforts on something that would really help the plight of women — say, spreading awareness about injustices such as sexual slavery, bride burning in South Asia, abortion, and female infanticide — tirelessly defend a view of the perfectible woman. In doing so, feminists don’t liberate women; they disappoint them. In its wake, feminism has left a sobering parade of women who are realizing that it’s a big, fat lie: You can’t have it all.
 
And why should you even want to?
 
Womankind doesn’t need to be saved or fixed or changed. We don’t need to prove ourselves by juggling a career, motherhood, and a slew of other accomplishments. We don’t have to wear power suits to be powerful. Our power is found in our femininity, in the wombs that give women the ability to be sacred chambers for new life. Everything that makes women women is what makes them valuable to society. We don’t have to contribute to the GDP to be productive. Mothers produce souls — souls that have eternal value. And women who never have children of their own are still spiritual mothers, helping and nurturing society’s underlings.
 
When we “liberate” women from the “menial” tasks of motherhood, when we suggest a woman loses her life and her identity if she stays home with the kids all day, when we say that women must be fiercer in the workplace or become more “rational” and physically and emotionally “stronger” like their male counterparts, what we’re really saying is that men and the male role in society is superior to our own, and we must do everything in our power to become more like them.
 
Man and woman share in God’s image and likeness. We are equal in dignity, but we’re not the same. It’s when we start striving for sameness that we — and society — start to fall apart.
 
 
What will happen if all women toughen up, strive to do it all, and be more than “just” wives and mothers? What if women start to believe a beautiful life is only possible once you have that beautiful career? Can we truly embrace our God-given vocation to nurture others if we’re more concerned with nurturing ourselves and catching up to the boys?
 
I’m not suggesting women don’t have a place in the workforce. Long before terms like “working mom” or “hybrid woman” snaked their way into feminist parlance, women were productive workers in the vineyard of the Lord. We’ve given birth to children. We’ve built domestic churches. Some of us have been called to be doctors, humanitarians, artists. But none of us has to be everything to everyone.
 
What the feminists seem to be missing is that a woman’s liberation must truly be freeing her from things that are holding her hostage — not releasing her from her supernatural calling and all that is good and sanctifying and makes her a woman.
 
Let us embrace the wisdom of the Catholic Church. Women, be who you were created to be: people who possess a special sensitivity and a sublime respect for the dignity of the human person. People who are inclined to follow the way of the cross, to nurture, and to hold the fabric of society together, not with high levels of productivity measured in output by hour but with the gift of self.
 
“What do you do?” I do enough. I am enough. I’m a mom. I’m a wife. I’m a woman, designed by God. I have no need to pretend to be more. I don’t have to roar to be heard. My life says it all.

Kate Wicker

By

Kate Wicker is a wife, mom of three little ones, and author of Weightless: Making Peace with Your Body. Prior to becoming a mom, she worked on the editorial staff of a regional parenting publication. Currently, Kate serves as a senior writer and health columnist for Faith & Family. Kate has written for a variety of regional and national media.

  • georgie-ann

    (learned while attending an opera: brava! is feminine for bravo!)

    maybe that’s one of our problems: English doesn’t have masculine & feminine nouns!

  • Adam Wood

    In a gender-studies class in college I remember hearing someone lament the double-standard: An aggressive, domineering man is seen as a successful role-model while the same qualities in a woman make a her a “bitch.” Likewise, a sexually prolific male is a revered as a stud, while a similarly active woman is a “slut.” The gist of the lamenter’s opinion was that women should be treated like men.

    Wrong answer. That aggressive man is an a-hole, and the promiscuous man is a slut, too.

    Forgive my language, but my point is:
    Women should stop trying to emulate men, live up to manly standards, or be judged according to male norms. Male norms in our worldly society are pretty awful.

    Women have always been the ones to sacrifice themselves, to become servants, to feed their children with their very body. These traditionally female roles are what Christ modeled and calls us to.

    Seeking approval by society, or “Man’s empty praise” should not be the goal of Christian women, nor of Christian men. All of us are called to something much less glamorous and comfortable.

  • georgie-ann

    blessed are those who can hear the voice of the God-given instincts that they were created & born with,…& whose instincts function pretty much along the lines of compatibility with Scriptural principles,…

    …and who have learned to turn “a deaf ear” to the seductive voices of worldly corruption,…

  • Karen

    Thanks for the article Kate! It is so nice to have my vocation as a stay at home mom and wife reaffirmed by others.

  • Tina Fisher

    Love the post and I love reading your blog.

    Being a stay at home Mom is the hardest job I’ve ever had! Hands down.

  • Karen

    Point No.1: “It’s all those courageous, outspoken modern feminists who, instead of concentrating their time and efforts on something that would really help the plight of women — say, spreading awareness about injustices such as sexual slavery, bride burning in South Asia, abortion, and female infanticide — tirelessly defend a view of the perfectible woman.”

    Please search a few feminist websites, where you will learn that feminists do spread awareness of all of those issues. We don’t give international issues as much attention in the US because there is very little we can about those things over here, and also because it looks hideously racist and self-congratulatory for Western women to talk about how those badly-behaved brown people in other places behave. We need to address the plight of women in the Third World but only in an effective and respectful manner.

    The best way to improve the lot of all women is to abandon the woo-woo idea that women have some undefined and undefinable connection the cosmos that somehow never involves thinking, learning, or achieving. All people, including women, should be taught that rational is in all circumstances superior to the emotional. Women need respect for our public achievements and accomplishments, not stupid, meaningless statements about our “special sensitivity.” Only concrete achievements count, and we help all women by encouraging them to obtain achievements. If men really value “special sensitivity,” they can learn to do it themselves.

  • Mary Hasson

    Kate,

    You capture beautifully what so many of us moms feel!

    Our identity is first and foremost as a daughter of God and our value (infinite!) comes from being loved by Him.

    It’s a shame that men, and now women, increasingly identify themselves only according the what they “do,” as if fulfillment will be measured according to an economic productivity index.

    Only Love lasts…and it’s in giving of ourselves in love that we mothers will find the deepest fulfillment, no matter how many other wonderful things we do.

    If we don’t love well–in our day-by-day mothering–nothing else will matter. And deep down, most moms know that. Thanks for helping us keep our eye on the ball, Kate!

  • Katherine

    I never understand why Feminists wanted to lower women’s standards instead of raising men’s.

  • Kate Wicker

    Karen, a few points:

    First, improve the lot of women? That’s just my point: Why do women who aren’t facing atrocities like bride burning, etc. in need of improvement? Why should we pull the victim card when we’re not victims? And abortion, female infanticide and forms of sexual slavery are happening right in this country; yet, I see modern day feminists pouring their time and energy into fighting for things like gender-neutral signs. This comes off as a sign of insecurity, not strength.

    What bothers me is how so many bright women buy into the radical feminist ideal that being a woman is only a matter of self-determination. Ignore God – or if you prefer Mother Nature – and make yourself into the woman you want (or think) you should be (or deserve to be; there’s always this sense of entitlement, isn’t there?). Yet, why not be the woman you were designed to be?

    Likewise, we may think we can have it all, and maybe we can. But once we have it all, we don’t know what to do with it.

    Second, you’re right: Women do deserve respect for their “public achievements.” But aren’t children “public” and “concrete achievements”? You’re here to collect your accolades because a mother gave birth to you.

    I never suggested that God designed women to not be “thinking, learning, or achieving” individuals, but we can be all of these things without sacrificing our gifts of intuition and compassion and without ever leaving the home.

    Let’s not confuse sensitivity with being overly emotional. I’m not suggesting women go around crying their eyes out. But the fact that women overall are designed to be compassionate nurturers is not a sign of weakness.

    Finally, I’ll get to my Vulcan reference. You write, “Rational is in all circumstances superior to the emotional.”

    Really?

    That sounds more like Vulcan talk than human talk.

    Humans – both men and women – are endowed with the faculty of reason. This is a good thing. I agree with you there. We are called to be thinking people (and at-home moms can be thinking people who achieve great things). But we are also emotional creatures. That’s what makes us human.

    If you really don’t want to embrace your special sensitivity and rely on logic alone, maybe you should join the Vulcans.

  • Gary Keith Chesterton

    All of these really good comments to one side, I absolutely hate that question. I live in Washington DC, and it’s the first thing anybody asks anybody. I always answer “as little as possible.” It gets a little laugh, but sends the signal that I don’t want to talk about my job, and that’s that. I change the subject right away. In this town I suppose people think I’m a spook or something.

  • elena maria vidal

    Brava, Kate!

  • Maria Cunningham

    Bravo again Kate!

  • Maria Cunningham
  • Rae

    Why does defending what you value have to come in the form of attacking others rather than explaining the goodness of what you have?

    Your last paragraph is entirely correct. You are enough. So why do you have to tear down others to prove it?

    It is hard for me to understand how it is that you improve your situation by blaming your insecurity on those you term feminists. It seems as though you would also blame the democrats for your insecurity in admitting to being a republican (or vice versa). I suppose that it is simply a human coping mechanism, but I do not see how it is helpful to suggest it as a model for others.

    Secondly, how long ago were you taking women’s studies classes? My experience was quite different from yours, and I wonder if it is because my classes were in the last five years, or just the nature of the type of school? Anyway, in my experience, the classes could be faulted for being far too tolerant of any choice a woman made. Want to be a SAHM? Great. Want to practice FGM? Great. We can’t tell you what is best.

    My point is simply that I do not know who these feminists are that you are setting yourself up against. NOW? Well then why not say “NOW” rather than “feminists”?

    Lastly, I can think of nothing more valuable than being “people who possess a special sensitivity and a sublime respect for the dignity of the human person. People who are inclined to follow the way of the cross, to nurture, and to hold the fabric of society together, not with high levels of productivity measured in output by hour but with the gift of self.” So why make it the specific realm of women? Why not include men in this great project called living a Christian life?

  • Sherri

    Kate, maybe you should give the neurosurgeon a chance to say “You stay home with your kids! That’s great!” My husband and my brother are both medical doctors, my father has a PhD, and that is what all three would say to you. So would my three female friends who are doctors. I don’t think that as many people look down on being a stay at home mom as we think when we are up to our eyes in dirty dishes and dirty diapers. I think a lot more people admire our courage and sacrifice and they know it’s not an easy job. I live in a university town and that is my experience.

  • Kate Wicker

    Rae, I’m sorry if I came across as attacking anyone who believes women deserve respect and equality. Or as one of my favorite teachers warned me against doing: “Don’t blow out someone else’s candle to make yours brighter.” The term “feminist” has gotten a bad rap, partly because it’s been muddied up by organizations like NOW. But in my personal experience – and perhaps I’m too quick to make global generalizations – many women who claim to be feminists are inadvertently perhaps extolling two traits: #1 the ability to juggle many balls at once or the secular gospel that it

  • Barbara

    Sherri and Rae (and Karen) make very good points. Why does upholding and defending the vocation of motherhood automatically involve harsh criticism against those who defend the right of women to act in a larger scope of roles. Feminism was never supposed to be about disparaging the vocation of motherhood but rather about opening up the possibility that women could do other things as well, and removing barriers which prevented women from exploring different passions and vocations by telling them “your place is in the home, only in the home”.

    We’re fortunate to live in a country where women can make those choices, where we’re not stoned if we try to go to school or even leave the house without a male relative. I fail to understand why so many Catholic women seem to want to send us to a watered down version of that place (okay so maybe not with the stoning, but you still should never ever leave the house) because “motherhood is the only thing you should ever consider worth doing, so put that science book down and get back in the kitchen and the nursery”. The women I admire most are the ones who mother both their children and the world, who read that science book while preparing dinner for the kids and talk to their husbands about philosophy and poetry.

    It’s worth considering that only in wealthy North America is motherhood considered in such a singular manner. Only here are Christian women exhorted to always and forever be mothers all the time, and ne’er do they step out of the home for a single second lest they change into “feminist liberal harpies” in many parts of the world women have to work outside the home out of necessity and yet they are no less the mother for it.

    Where does that leave saints and other faithful women who were virgins, or who were called to serve God through pursuits deemed (though implicitly, by the author) less womanly, such as St. Catherine of Siena, who acted as ambassador to the Pope, or St. Joan of Arc who was a military strategist, or Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz, who was a philosopher, mathematician and poet. Or Marie Curie, or Catherine of Alexandria. The bible is full of women who not only answered the call of God as wives and mothers, but who answered it in other ways. One does not know and can not judge how God calls someone, how He maps a specific constellation of gifts, experiences and graces within her brain for a purpose which only He knows. Women must have the freedom to discern that purpose and to act on it without the hindrance of good intentioned people who suggest that “while you may feel close to Him when you write a poem, you shouldn’t write poems because your job is to be a mother, and mothers can’t be poets.” If the call is to motherhood, than glory be, but if it is to virginhood, or motherhood and …glory be all the same.

  • Barbara

    Sorry Kate, your post and mine both appeared at exactly the same time so I didn’t read your response I had already sent mine, and you do seem to respond to my concerns, so it’s all good.

  • Tim

    Are “masculinity” and “femininity” by nature or by convention?

  • georgie-ann

    “this above all, to thine own self be true,”…

    not a scripture, but perhaps applicable & helpful, nonetheless,…

    sometimes all of the verbal wrangling that begins to happen in these thread discussions–with the accompanying back-and-forth accusations & defensiveness–just makes it seem like we’ve become a bunch of “sound-bite-ridden cultural talking heads” trying to get some all-encompassing theoretical formula “just right” (& then i guess we’ll try to squeeze ourselves into that “correct” picture?)…while being a little too ready to NOT appreciate that that “other/different” person is only being just who they are, dealing with what’s on their plate right now, plus a whole lot of prior “conditioning” input and experiences as well,…

    it seems to happen in a lot of threads,…

    if instead, we just begin to radiate our own personal comfort in “being” who we are–not so much needing to “justify ourselves” as one thing vs. something else–i think we would not only have more personal peace, but in some cases, others could find even better inspiration from our peace, than from many of our words,… especially if the words have to become defensive and/or contentious,…

    certainly “motherhood” is a beautiful feminine condition to be at peace in & from which to radiate your joy, pride, love, satisfaction & fulfillment out to the world,…just think of all the lovely Madonna pictures,…of course it has its demands and “mundane” aspects,…but it is a deep & meaningful calling answered from a beautiful faithful place,…

    God has blessed motherhood,…like those safe-driving sayings*: let’s not get so busy, or going so fast, or trying to fit in so many extra things, that we get too far ahead, or too far afield, of our calling,…not only our families, but our own selves, could miss a lot,…this doesn’t mean that you have to always be “stuck” at home, (as per one description), but this time is precious and valuable,…give yourself permission to love & enjoy it,…

    this usually contributes to having happy children,…

    *”never drive faster than your angel can fly!”

  • Maman A Droit

    I think this article is great. As a stay-at-home mom with a polisci degree, I’ve experienced both sides of feminist attitude towards the idea. A few of my friends really have been supportive and think being a SAHM is just as valid if a choice as any other. But I’ve also had the opposite: feminists (both male and female!) who act like any choice is valid, unless of course, your choice of careers is to stay at home with your kids! I’ve heard snide comments, and even had people (who knew me just as well or better than they know hubby) completely ignore me in social situations, then asked my husband about his career. I’ve been asked why I’m “wasting” my education. It
    is awesome that some of you are so supportive of being a SAHM, but many people still don’t see it as a valid option.

  • Lynn Flores

    I’m a single catholic woman…Thank God smilies/smiley.gif

  • Michael

    Kate, maybe you should give the neurosurgeon a chance to say “You stay home with your kids! That’s great!” My husband and my brother are both medical doctors, my father has a PhD, and that is what all three would say to you. So would my three female friends who are doctors. I don’t think that as many people look down on being a stay at home mom as we think when we are up to our eyes in dirty dishes and dirty diapers. I think a lot more people admire our courage and sacrifice and they know it’s not an easy job. I live in a university town and that is my experience.

    And brava to this. As a rule men probably are a LOT more appreciative of the stay at home mom then women are. Women tend to be competitive and catty so maybe they become defensive when questions like that are asked. With men a woman is much less likely to be judged negatively for making the choice of hearth over career. Actually, you would be surprised how much approval you would get for that decision. My mother had to work to help support the family but both she and her children wished she could have been home while we were growing up.

  • Jean M. Heimann

    Kate,

    This an excellent article which reflects the beauty and nobility of motherhood. I grew up during the sexual revolution and was inundated with the lies of the revolutionary feminists of the day. They portrayed motherhood as something to be loathed and dreaded — something that would tie a woman down to a life of drudgery and to an unfaithful and unloving spouse.[smiley=angry]

    It wasn’t until later in life that I learned the true meaning and the joy that this vocation can bring. I found a wonderful, loving spouse, and, although I was unable to have biological children, I acquired a stepson and have other “spiritually adopted” children, which softened my heart. I have also helped other women recognize the joy of motherhood through my work as a crisis pregnancy counselor.

    I feel sorry for those women whose career becomes their life and they forgo the privilege of becoming mothers. They often end up becoming angry and embittered, hateful and envious of those with children.

    Today, the beauty and joys that come from self-giving love are stressed and taught in our Catholic catechesis through John Paul II’s theology of the body, which is the answer to so many prayers. I thank God for people like you, Kate, who live it out in your lives. God bless you for sharing and living out the truth! [smiley=happy]

  • Jessica

    Nice article, Kate. I chose to stay home with my little ones because I didn’t want a hectic life for my family. We, as adults, are so product-oriented- we must achieve, be able to show something for our effort, write it on our list of accomplishments. This isn’t how children are- they are naturally process-oriented. They live in the moment and just enjoy exploring and trying new things when given free time without our adult constraints on them. One of my favorite parts of parenting is just sitting on the floor and playing with them, without an agenda, without having to go to an activity, and I wouldn’t have this opportunity if I hadn’t given up my career (as a child psychologist, by the way), at least for now. As I read on in an article on NPR.org lately (http://www.npr.org/templates/s…=124616719), women can have it all, just not at the same time. And who’s to say what “having it all” is anyway? I try not to have to justify myself to anyone because I know I’m doing what’s right for my kids, my family, and myself. Life really is too short to worry about what others think about my choices even though it’s hard not to. Jobs will be there when my children are older and less dependent on me. Their sweet little smiles and cozy cuddles reading on the couch won’t be there forever. I’m sad for those moms who miss out on that thinking they have to have a high-powered career to be a productive woman. Alright, I’m going to go snuggle in bed with my baby now, even though I can’t put that on my vita. [smiley=happy]

  • Deb

    I think my issue with feminism comes from the fact that they have veered so far from their original goal which was equal rights for men and women. When did equal rights turn into equality itself? Men and women are different, always have been, always will be. We should embrace our differences and use them to grow and enhance this world.

    I think it’s the same with racism these days. Racism is defined as thinking a different race is in somehow inferior to one’s own, however all one has to do these days is make an innocent comment perceived in a negative light by someone else to be tarred a racist. It’s ridiculous.

    But in having said all that, there’s no reason you should feel ashamed. Study after study shows children are best off with a SAHM and if anything you are doing more than the best neurosurgeon in the world in that you’re preparing the next generation to be a productive and effective breed.

  • Michelle Reitemeyer

    Are “masculinity” and “femininity” by nature or by convention?

    My toddler boys have never pretended to breastfeed their stuffed animals or dolls, but my toddler girls have. Half my toddler boys’ vocabulary (and even my older boys vocabulary) seemed to be car sounds, explosions and other sound effects. My toddler girls were always much more expressive with words and tended to have self-selected activities like tea parties.

    I suppose you could claim that my husband and I only model traditional gender roles and even our 2 year olds pick that up. (And my husband is definitely one to use sound effects more than I.) But my boys love to cook and help out in the kitchen, and my girls love to do things with their daddy, even if it means watching football. Household chores are not assigned based on gender, so any gender might be wiping down bathroom sinks or taking out the garbage.

    While people are unique and there may be boys and girls who seem to defy traditional stereotypes (my one son, for example, LOVES babies and is always stopping his sword fighting or baseball playing to play peek-a-boo), for the most part, a few hours at any day care center will demonstrate that boys and girls have strong preferences for different activities. Nature wins.

  • Lydia

    “I’m not suggesting women don’t have a place in the workforce. Long before terms like “working mom” or “hybrid woman” snaked their way into feminist parlance, women were productive workers in the vineyard of the Lord. We’ve given birth to children. We’ve built domestic churches. Some of us have been called to be doctors, humanitarians, artists.”

    Well gee, cousin, I’m glad you’re not suggesting that women don’t have a place in the workforce, because in America they occupy roughly half of it, and not because they’ve been “called” to exercise some extraordinary gift in public forum -some rare and precious talent that impels them to deviate from the normal path of home and hearth. Mostly they are exercising quite ordinary gifts in order to keep the bills paid and the refrigerator filled, which is a task that their husband (if they have one) can’t manage alone.

    Leaving the home to do paid work IS the normal path of all American adults who do not inhabit the upper middle class and above. I love staying home with my small children and I think they’re better off for not having a Mom who is dividing her attention IN ADDITION to their Dad who works 100 hours/week, but I don’t think that framing my (our) socioeconomic edge case as the ideal fulfillment of womanly destiny is very useful.

    Most husbands aren’t doctors or entrepreneurs. Most women have always worked. Most women WILL always work. I believe that the modern feminist movement is doing right by the majority of American women by keeping focus on all those persistent first-world inequities that seem so trivial compared to FGM and bride burning (the wage gap, the second shift, lack of reasonable parental leave, lack of high-quality affordable childcare, the punishing schedules of the American labor force etc.), because it’s THOSE things that make working outside the home an overwhelming proposition for so many woman. It’s not so terrible to earn your bread. But earning your own and also being expected to bake everybody else’s is obviously going to rankle.

    Being a woman may not be only a matter of self-determination, but creating a culture that promotes the success and happiness of working woman is going to require some pretty serious determination that extends way beyond the self. It’s a lot easier to say “no, I won’t take a survival job that offers less for me and my family in the long term so my husband can do less than half the work of raising this family right now” and “no, I won’t accept a lower salary than a man who puts in the same hours” and “no, I won’t leave my six-week-old baby and spend two hours a day pumping milk in the the bathroom, I need real parental leave” if you’re being backed up by a nation of women who have also decided that they’re tired of being exploited by doing two jobs for one (paltry) salary.

    Working is not the problem. Or if it is, we are in some serious trouble, because our economy is utterly dependent on the female half of its workforce.

  • Cathy

    About a year ago I was at an out-of-town seminar with my husband. One of the participants, a peer of my hubby’s, asked me “What do you do?” As a mother of seven, I was so used to hearing a different question that I was certain she’d said “When are you DUE?” After assuring her I wasn’t pregnant (while she looked at me like I was crazy) I went on to tell her I was an author and freelance writer.
    Now I am those things and more, having recently returned to full-time work after 23 years as “just” a mom. I love all the roles I’ve been blessed to fill. When you are at home with little children, the days can seem endless, and the loneliness was one of the hardest crosses to bear. I used to think I would be doing “only” that forever. Now I know the truth: God tends to give us opportunities to wear many hats over the course of our lifetimes, and he doesn’t give us dreams and varied talents just to see us ignore them.

  • Kate Wicker

    Lydia, the point of this article was not to tsk, tsk women who have to work outside of the home either but rather to support moms who have chosen to stay home to not be swayed by the worldly (feminist?) ideas that staying at home means you’re missing out on something or that any woman has to be the same as a man or should even want to be. I understand economics often demand women work outside of the home and further believe that women can add a lot to the workforce. I’m passionate about encouraging mothers (or fathers!) who have made the decision to stay at home with their children. I do not believe anyone has the right to judge or condemn mothers who chose to work outside their homes. I know an amazing mom of many children who had to put her children in school go back to work for the good of her family. She is making tremendous sacrifices doing this and deserves admiration, not condemnation.

    As wives, mother, and women, we have to do what is right for our family at the time. I believe my family would have suffered had I remained in law school (I mentioned in the article that I dropped out of law school to support my husband through medical school). There are times, I admit, when I find myself longing for the time management skills of another mother who appears to balance it all. That’s when I have to stop myself and remind myself to focus on what I do right. And as a friend reminded me, we have to at all times keep our focus on God. This keeps us from needing affirmation from a society that will always find some fault in our decisions.

    Blessings.

  • Christine

    Kate, what was your lenten promise anyway?

    Playful chiding aside, I also grew up thinking that I had to be “a man” in a lot of respects because I was daddy’s little girl and daddy was raised by a single woman during the depression. My grandmother suffered greatly to raise her two boys and my father never wanted his daughters to suffer as they had so many years before.

    We women have been enslaved in other ways, however, due to the ideals and agendas of 20th century (including but not limited to feminism). Now a woman has to work full-time, keep house and take care of the family. Marriages suffer and fail much more than they ever have. Children more often live in poverty because of their being only one parent in the house. Some women and men never get married at all and move from one unfulfilling relationship after another.

    I think that many men would love to have a wife to take care of them and be there for them. We women must also admit that when we work, a little peice of us stays there, and is unavailable for our guys. I love my career, but if I could wish for anything, it would be more time to be with my husband.

    It seems to me that nobody wins in our society and many problems with the family have gotten worse. The situation seems hopeless, but with God there is always hope.

    Kate, be proud of your state in life. Most women under the age of 40 would love to stay home and take care of their families. You have been blessed with the opportunity. The ones that give you a strange look are probably envious of your situation and could use your prayers.

    I think many women today are just tired of playing the superhero and just wish they could spend more time taking care of the people they love.

  • Terri Monahan-Mitchell

    You are a Director of Human Development !!!

  • Daily Grace

    Being raised by a stay-at-home mom who is a woman of great faith, true virtue and endless courage, I enjoyed reading your post and understand your perspective.
    I have always thought of my role as wife, mother, grandmother and business partner to be the vocation that the Lord has called me to. When I look at my life as vocation I never consider what I do as

  • Donna

    >I feel sorry for those women whose career becomes their life >and they forgo the privilege of becoming mothers. They often >end up becoming angry and embittered, hateful and envious of >those with children.
    While the sterotypical ‘bitter old maid’ does exist, there are also women who have become embittered by being SAHM’s – a large portion of my older female relatives, for example. I remember sitting at family gatherings, forced to listen to whining about how lucky we younger women are, because ‘you aren’t stuck at home with a bunch of d-d kids, like I was !’ And, IMHO, there are few things scarier than seeing an elderly relative finish off her tongue-lashing of her grown son with the remark, “I wish I’d never had you !” (I saw it happen once, years ago..and have never been able to get it out of my head…[smiley=sad])
    They may be fewer in number, but I’d bet bitter mothers cause a lot more damage than bitter singles….

  • Maria

    I guess it’s natural to lack confidence in our decisions, but I really think we women need to get some backbone and not be so darn insecure about our choices. If you have the privilege to be able to stay at home with your children and not have to bring in income, then celebrate it, and don’t be so worried about what others think.

    Most women around this world have to work to sustain families. They may not go into office buildings, but they must work to keep their families afloat. Even though some families make great sacrifices in this country for the mom to stay at home, it is still a luxury. I’d like to think most women think very hard these days about how to best care for their families. No matter what choice is made, we should have some confidence and stop comparing ourselves to others or waiting to be validated by others.

  • Michelle

    There was a Cathy cartoon years ago where Cathy’s friend Andrea was distressed that her young daughter was playing house all the time, being the good wife and mommy. Andrea then stated she must now stay home so her daughter could know there were other options out there, that she could be anything she wanted. Cathy responded something to the effect of, “You want to quit your job and stay home so your daughter can know she can work when she grows up?”

    We all stress about what is best for our children. There is no right answer because everyone is different. I was raised by a single mother who worked. I never felt less for it. My mom worked hard to take care of us. I now stay home with my girls because my husband work 80 hours a week. Each situation is different.

    We should always support each other in life. Its not a contest to see who is best, its about doing what is best for you and your family.

  • Kathryn

    that most the author’s husband’s peers–the doctors and reseachers–are the children of stay at home moms. I just turned 40, and when I was young, all the moms I knew were stay at home moms. Of course, I supose that could be just because of the area in which I live.

    I might suggest to any SAHM who is criticised for being a SAHM to ask the critic whether s/he would rather have been cared for by a SAHM, or whether s/he felt that day care at a young eage, and an empty house during the school years was something s/he enjoyed, or would have enjoyed.

  • Barbara

    While the sterotypical ‘bitter old maid’ does exist, there are also women who have become embittered by being SAHM’s – a large portion of my older female relatives, for example. I remember sitting at family gatherings, forced to listen to whining about how lucky we younger women are, because ‘you aren’t stuck at home with a bunch of d-d kids, like I was !’ And, IMHO, there are few things scarier than seeing an elderly relative finish off her tongue-lashing of her grown son with the remark, “I wish I’d never had you !” (I saw it happen once, years ago..and have never been able to get it out of my head…[smiley=sad])
    They may be fewer in number, but I’d bet bitter mothers cause a lot more damage than bitter singles….

    I just wanted to comment on Donna’s point. I’ve experienced this as well among some of my older relatives and friends of the same generation. There are many women of past generations who were stay at home moms, not because they chose to be, but because it was expected of them and no one listened to their opinion about it. This is why I have difficulty with the sort of “feminine genius” idealism which is being brought up here. It’s all well and good to revel in the beauty and joy of being a stay at home mom when you have made that choice yourself, when you have had the ability to say “no” or “yes” and have said “yes,” but still it’s necessary to have the freedom to make that choice or to not make it, or to make several choices at once. Feminism helped to open that door for women so that their “yes” is actually a “yes” and not a begrudging “I guess I’d better”.

  • Feminist

    You’re writing as if all feminists are saying the same thing. It’s akin to me saying that all Catholic clergymen are paedophiles. It’s not true, but it’s not totally wrong too.

    While some feminists are like what you say, most (that I know) are just interested in creating equal opportunities. Choice is all we’re concerned about. If your choice is to be a stay home mum, it is an informed decision, you made it consciously, we’ll say go for it! You go girl! And do us proud. =)

    But at the same time, we want others who may not want this life to have a chance of choosing their own.

    Be proud of who you are and own up to your choice. But there’s really no need to bring down others’ choices just to justify your own.

    Be blessed. =)

MENU